Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+T\/A\s+OPDS\s+DK7FC\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: T/A OPDS DK7FC (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 16:55:19 +0200
Jay, Am 17.10.2013 14:36, schrieb [email protected]: Several stations on this end are now set up to receive OP Deep Search ... including Garry K3SIW in IL. Being that far inland is quite a disadv
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00610.html (11,486 bytes)

2. Re: LF: T/A OPDS DK7FC (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 16:57:23 +0200
PS: Jay, Markus, What is the S/N performance of OPDS compared to WSPR-15 (apart from the fact that the callsigns must be known in advance and that there is less information into one sequence) ?? 73,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00611.html (12,249 bytes)

3. Re: LF: T/A OPDS DK7FC (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 14:36:22 +0200
Hi John, Jay, Markus, OK. Well, it seems to work. But i can't value the results. Why is it only 96% and what is the meaning of 2 mHz here? Seems the S/N is rather low. Condx must have been poor. Were
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00612.html (13,255 bytes)

4. Re: LF: T/A OPDS DK7FC (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 09:37:30 -0400
OPDS T/A enthusiasts Stefan, here's my copy from last night. Missed the first transmission not knowing you were on the air. John managed to snag the earliest transmission and one more decode late in
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00613.html (10,942 bytes)

5. Re: LF: T/A OPDS DK7FC (score: 1)
Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 17:41:25 +0200
Stefan, Jay, John, the "96%" number shows the temporal overlap between the receive period (ie the duration of the currently used FFT, about 35 minutes) and the identified Op sequence (33 minutes). Wi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00614.html (18,225 bytes)

6. Re: LF: T/A OPDS DK7FC (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 17:23:08 +0100
Both ROS Hf/Mf data modes and Opera , s/n measurements use the path-sim simulator as the calibration reference , which is higher than the levels produced by fldigi / wspr etc , ie transmission needs
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00615.html (19,715 bytes)

7. Re: LF: T/A OPDS DK7FC (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 17:31:19 -0400
T/A OPDS enthusiasts It appears that I mistakenly ran with a known setup issue last night ... so my reported SNR numbers should not be considered accurate. The issue is now resolved and the setup is
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00616.html (16,895 bytes)

8. Re: LF: T/A OPDS DK7FC (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 17:43:18 -0400
T/A OPDS enthusiasts It appears that I mistakenly ran with a known setup issue last night ... so my reported SNR numbers should not be considered accurate. The issue is now resolved and the setup is
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00617.html (16,994 bytes)

9. Re: LF: T/A OPDS DK7FC (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 23:59:01 +0200
Jay, John, LF, ...so it is another OPDS32 night? Or are you prepared for both, OPDS32 and OPDS8 ? 73, Stefan Am 18.10.2013 23:43, schrieb John Andrews: My setup is running, but I can't check or modif
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00618.html (17,884 bytes)

10. Re: LF: T/A OPDS DK7FC (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 18:15:08 -0400
OPDS32 Jay -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] Stefan Schäfer To: [email protected] [email protected] Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 5:59 PM Subje
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00619.html (19,487 bytes)

11. Re: LF: T/A OPDS DK7FC (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 00:38:56 +0200
Markus, Wow, somehow genial! Where did you learn to make such a program? Thanks for the explanations. What is the next challenge? WSPRDS?? Isn't it possible to correlate WSPR signals as well? 73, Ste
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00620.html (18,363 bytes)

12. Re: LF: T/A OPDS DK7FC (score: 1)
Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 00:50:27 +0200
Stefan, thanks for the flowers. WSPR correlation? In principle, yes, but... http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/rsgb_lf_group/message/3207 Good to see you on air! Opds has identified your signal already
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00621.html (20,647 bytes)

13. Re: LF: T/A OPDS DK7FC (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 12:00:20 -0400
Stefan Wasn't expecting you to start transmitting OPDS today ... just a thought for the future. But if you want to, that's okay too. OPDS32 is capable of of decoding at about -50 dB s/n (relative to
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00622.html (13,245 bytes)

14. Re: LF: T/A OPDS DK7FC (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 22:35:27 -0230 (NDT)
Hi Jay, Group, Lately, I've been busy trying to rx below 100 kHz with an old Marconi XH100 receiver. One of these ebay chinese DDS boards was used to provide the LO, but it was not stable. The 10.7 M
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00623.html (14,461 bytes)

15. Re: LF: T/A OPDS DK7FC (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 02:56:57 +0200
Hi Jay, I wanted to give it a try tonite. First i wanted to use DF6NM's OPDS software which i would really prefer over the ROS-OP stuff. But then i found that the sndoutpt.exe creates a ramp in the a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00624.html (15,024 bytes)

16. Re: LF: T/A OPDS DK7FC (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 22:11:53 -0400
Stefan, Had the first hit at 0149z. Said -46.5 dB! John, W1TAG
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00625.html (16,571 bytes)

17. Re: LF: T/A OPDS DK7FC (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 21:55:23 -0400
Stefan Firing up SL and OPDS now ... results in 1/2 hour or maybe sooner ;~) Jay Jay, Correction: Markus created a special file for me which makes the ramp time shorter than 1 ms. So now my PA can se
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00626.html (16,600 bytes)

18. Re: LF: T/A OPDS DK7FC (score: 1)
Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 03:33:58 +0200
Problem solved ;-) date time call distance frequency bandwidth snr correlation 2013-10-18 01:49:25 DK7FC 175km 137559.913Hz 4mHz -19.1dBOp 45% 19.8dB 2013-10-18 01:18:08 R7NT 2060km 137590.998Hz 4mHz
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00627.html (16,652 bytes)

19. Re: LF: T/A OPDS DK7FC (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 03:36:42 +0200
Jay, Correction: Markus created a special file for me which makes the ramp time shorter than 1 ms. So now my PA can send OPDS with Markus' software and i am on air in this mode tonite until 06:15 UTC
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00628.html (15,934 bytes)

20. Re: LF: T/A OPDS DK7FC (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 22:40:55 -0400
Stefan Surprised at poor s/n (-46 dBOp) on initial decode ... maybe we're in a fade. Progress monitored at : http://www.w1vd.com/grabber.html Jay Jay, Correction: Markus created a special file for me
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00629.html (16,828 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu