Hello Rik and all LFers, I wish we could convince the developers to bring back JT9-2, JT9-5 and JT9-10 at least! I would even like to see JT9-30 supported. I believe these slow modes would allow for
Hello Paul, Version 0.8 r3058 on WSPR15 runs for days on end here on Windows 7 pro 64 Bit, no memory leaks nothing, just keeps on keeping on! As you know I have tried asking on the WSJT-X forum for s
Paul, Am 06.09.2018 13:03, schrieb N1BUG: I have been trying for almost a year to get WSJT-X 0.95 to run under Windows 10 but it keeps crashing. Unfortunately I do not have a PC with an older version
Hello Chris, Can you transmit WSPR-15 on LF? I would go to set up the tools from DF6NM and try to decode your transmission using WSJT-X v1.9.0-rc2. 73, Stefan Am 06.09.2018 13:22, schrieb Chris Wilso
Hi Stefan, for QSO's we would need the slower JT9 versions (JT9-2 and so on), not WSPR. Does anyone know what WSJT-X version(s) supported JT9-2? 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T Paul, Am 06.09.2018 13:03, schrie
Thanks for this Stefan. Reason to go on trying then. Maybe I can find an old PC with Windows XP or 7 on it to play with. Yes of course. I expect that but one still needs useful tools. I am a thrill s
I have been told the last version to support it is 095r3278. That's the one I have which does not work correctly under Win 10. I just tried it again. One problem is that trying to adjust the waterfal
Hello Markus, Good to know. That's why i see no problem here since i'm still using the old PC running Win7, 32-bit. I thought that radio amateurs usually tend to use their old machines for radio excl
Hello Paul, If you have the hard drive space just load Windows 7 and dual boot the machine. Not sure if trying a "virtual machine" would work, probably asking for trouble! Is there any reason you don
Hello Stefan, Yes, I can run WSPR-15 OK and have done many times. I drop the voltage to the PA in deference to heat production but it works fine if anyone is listening :) -- Best regards, Chris mailt
Hi Chris, Yes please. Give it a try. But it may be useless right now since the QRN is extremely high, local thunderstorms... Anyway, if you are curious to see if it works, just do it. I'm already lis
As good as JT9 is, in whatever speed-flavour, at LF it throws away one aspect of LF propagation that isn't not really availalble for HF, phase stability over longer periods, at least suited to a few
Hello Chris, I've sorted out some bugs in the configuration, now i should be ready to receive. Can you give me a feedback, are you on air? Which TX frequency? 73, Stefan Am 06.09.2018 15:07, schrieb
Hello Stefan, it will have to be on my normal 137.550 as I do not have time tonight to re-tune the coil. I need to take the dogs out then I'll swap the antenna over and give it a go. Let me know if 1
Hi Chris, Yes, that should work too. Or, can you reduce the power by 6 dB and then work into the WSPR-15 range? If your PA permits. You need that auto-variometer :-) I'm ready. Tell me when the first
Hello Chris, Dual boot would serve no useful purpose that I can see. Whatever version I run needs to run all of my shack software which is a 24/7/365 task. If I were convinced it would help, I would
Chris, There is a thunderstorm directly over my roof! The tree is still alive ;-) I think it makes no sense to try now on LF. Maybe it is better that i do some tests with a local TX signal before wai
