Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+SL6440\s+\/\s+mixers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+SL6440\s+\/\s+mixers\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: SL6440 / mixers (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 13:57:18 EDT; In a message dated 17/09/2004 14:14:54 GMT Standard Time, [email protected] writes: Dear LF Group, I have been considering purchasing the SRA-8 for the first mixer in a new LF receiver I am designing. Th; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-09/msg00102.html (8,326 bytes)
2. Re: LF: SL6440 / mixers (score: 1): Author: "Andy Talbot" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 20:08:19 +0100; I have used to SRA-8 in an LF receiver and found no problems whatsoever with signal handling. It is a standard level 7 mixer, (optimised for 7dBm Lo drive) so will have a 3rd order output intercept a; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-09/msg00104.html (10,430 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]