Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Rugby\s+\-\s+Anthorn\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Rugby\s+\-\s+Anthorn\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Rugby - Anthorn (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: 15 May 2007 08:52 GMT; Dear all, I do not have a former log entry how strong MSF may have been before on 60 kHz here in eastern Bavaria (JN68GN), but today it is just one S unit lower than HBN on 75 kHz, also employing an; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00206.html (11,529 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Rugby - Anthorn (score: 1): Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 07:04:36 +0100; Althorn is definitely a lot down in strength here in IO91PJ compared with Rugby, and I know they had predicted this would be the case as it is significantly further away. But if it is that far down i; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00207.html (10,840 bytes)
3. LF: Rugby - Anthorn (score: 1): Author: Alberto di Bene <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 23:50:15 +0200; The recent move of the 60 kHz time/frequency reference station from Rugby to Anthorn has considerably contributed to the diminution of RF pollution, at least here where I live... :-) Rugby was S9 on; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00208.html (9,917 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]