Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Region\s+1\s+IARU\s+Conference\:\s+136\s+\&\s+500kHz\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Region\s+1\s+IARU\s+Conference\:\s+136\s+\&\s+500kHz\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Region 1 IARU Conference: 136 & 500kHz (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 10:33:19 +0000 (GMT); I was waiting to make an announcement and combine it with a comment on the 500kHz position, once a chairman for a proposed Working Group was agreed (see below), however, since Stewart has put his not; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-11/msg00102.html (10,097 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Region 1 IARU Conference: 136 & 500kHz (score: 1): Author: "Alexander S. Yurkov" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 17:45:50 +0000 (GMT); Hi, Group. With reference to the proposal that RSGB put forward for consideration of an amateur allocation at or around 500kHz, It should be wonderfull! 136 kHz is too low and 1.8 MHz is too high...; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-11/msg00103.html (8,689 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]