Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Receiver\s+insensitivity\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Receiver\s+insensitivity\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Receiver insensitivity (score: 1): Author: "Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 14:06:01; Peter, in case the noise source turns out to be local it can help a lot to have the antenna, including matching device, at a remote spot (back yard) and go with a well shielded. coax to the shack. I; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00448.html (8,758 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Receiver insensitivity (score: 1): Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 12:36:38 +0100; I tried to send this message 3 times last week it apparently got held up as I had started the subject line with the word "help" the software at Blacksheep thought it was some sort of command but cou; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00450.html (10,114 bytes)
3. LF: Receiver insensitivity (score: 1): Author: "Peter Cleall" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 22:58:39 +0100; I tried to send this message 3 times last week it apparently got held up as I had started the subject line with the word "help" the software at Blacksheep thought it was some sort of command but coul; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00460.html (10,741 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]