Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\s+Welbrook\s+Loops\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\s+Welbrook\s+Loops\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re Welbrook Loops (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:14:37 +0000 (GMT); Tim Try:- Loop Antenna News and Information Forum [email protected] Loads of info there!! 73 petefmt On Wed, 10/6/09, tim hague <[email protected]> wrote: From: tim hague <[email protected]; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-06/msg00011.html (12,007 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Re Welbrook Loops (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:15:07 +0000 (GMT); Tim Try:- Loop Antenna News and Information F [email protected] Loads of info there!! 73 petefmt On Wed, 10/6/09, tim hague <[email protected]> wrote: From: tim hague <[email protected]; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-06/msg00047.html (11,985 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Re Welbrook Loops (score: 1): Author: Dave Pick <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 08:33:23 +0100; Tim Yes, I use one all the time. The problem is usually the receiver, the Wellbrook will easily overload even the best receivers with broadcast signals as most don't have any front-end selectivity be; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-06/msg00049.html (10,806 bytes)
4. Re: LF: Re Welbrook Loops (score: 1): Author: tim hague <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 08:14:51 +0100; I tried some expeiments with measuring loop antennas at LF and MF a while back - changing the height above ground from 0 - 10m made virtually no difference. The only thing that made a lot of differen; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-06/msg00092.html (11,479 bytes)
5. Re: LF: Re Welbrook Loops (score: 1): Author: tim hague <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:44:38 +0100; Loop Antenna News and Information F <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/loopantennas;_ylc=X3oDMTJlNjltdm4xBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE1BGdycElkAzEyODUxOTEwBGdycHNwSWQDMTcwODM5NjM3OQRzZWMDaGRyBHNsawNocGgEc3RpbWUDMTI0ND; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-06/msg00217.html (11,544 bytes)
6. Re: LF: Re Welbrook Loops (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 22:00:42 +0100; Dear Tim, LF Group, I tried some expeiments with measuring loop antennas at LF and MF a while back - changing the height above ground from 0 - 10m made virtually no difference. The only thing that ma; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-06/msg00223.html (11,511 bytes)
7. Re: LF: Re Welbrook Loops (score: 1): Author: tim hague <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 09:47:48 +0100; Yes, I use one all the time. The problem is usually the receiver, the Wellbrook will easily overload even the best receivers with broadcast signals as most don't have any front-end selectivity below; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-06/msg00256.html (10,083 bytes)
8. Re: LF: Re Welbrook Loops (score: 1): Author: [email protected] (Trevor Smithers); Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:40 +0100 (BST); I use a 1530 as well, its mounted on a rotator about 2ft above ground level on a Barenco socket/spike. Works well 80m down to 500khz but being so close to the ground its a bit deaf above 80m as you w; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-06/msg00268.html (9,568 bytes)
9. LF: Re Welbrook Loops (score: 1): Author: tim hague <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 08:02:43 +0100; I've got a ALA 1530 Wellbrook Loop, is anyone using one of these for 500kHz monitoring?, although I can hear NDB's nothing on 500kHz. Tim M0AFJ; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-06/msg00278.html (8,633 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]