Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+transformer\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+transformer\s+question\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: transformer question (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 11:07:20 +0100; Dear J, LF Group, I have been following your antenna problems with interest, and am glad to hear you are finally QRV! As far as the transformer design goes - don't change anything yet... With the win; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-07/msg00042.html (10,086 bytes)
2. LF: Re: transformer question (score: 1): Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 10:10:05 +0100; Hi J, yes you may still have some effect there. My simple thoughts on tranformers are as follows. If you are only aiming at 136kHz wide-banding the transformer is not so important so bi-filar winding; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-07/msg00043.html (11,619 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]