Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Wellbrook\s+ALA\-1530\s+active\s+loop\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Wellbrook\s+ALA\-1530\s+active\s+loop\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: Wellbrook ALA-1530 active loop (score: 1): Author: Alberto di Bene <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 12:23:10 +0200; Well, the message got through, so the culprit is not that word... Let me try once again, maybe changing some suspect words of my previous message(s). -- Hi Alan, well, I am not that interested in the; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-10/msg00085.html (11,318 bytes)
2. LF: Re: Wellbrook ALA-1530 active loop (score: 1): Author: Alberto di Bene <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 14:55:51 +0200; Are there specific words that trigger the anti-spam policy of this reflector ? I tried two times to answer Alan's message, but apparently both messages have been silently discarded... if this one mak; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-10/msg00094.html (10,169 bytes)
3. LF: Re: Wellbrook ALA-1530 active loop (score: 1): Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 18:14:49 +0100; Hi Alberto, well the guys on the AOR 7030 group seem to rate it as well, but what are they comparing it with ?? that is the question. Surely there is not much secret in loops these days, but when I l; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-10/msg00100.html (10,548 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]