Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+WSPR2\-15\s+600m\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+WSPR2\-15\s+600m\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: WSPR2-15 600m (score: 1): Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 13:08:50 +0100; WSPR15 really achieve anything that WSPR2 does not? oh yes! The SNR limit of wspr-2 is about -29 dB in 2.5kHz whereas wspr-15 can look down to -38 dB. If you browse the database for LF last night an; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00230.html (10,682 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Re: WSPR2-15 600m (score: 1): Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 12:29:59 +0000; Hi Marcus Thanks for the reply. Yes I am aware of Stefan's TA results on LF. I was particularly referring to 600m. Here I see the same distance being covered covered between 2 stations on WSPR2 and W; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00552.html (11,334 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]