LF: Re: WSPR2-15 600m

To:	<[email protected]>
Subject:	LF: Re: WSPR2-15 600m
From:	"Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
Date:	Sun, 17 Feb 2013 13:08:50 +0100
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20121107; t=1361102936; bh=x2LsgHT6DN8sbv2NXkAMfhlirMg4gaefVhYi8s4ldUc=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=qcJCNBRT+83VEBpHANTcY6HkRPd2nzDC69gp7RdmjCdwGN9JJKxTsbiVSMvnSJnzy xdev3QEWFuE/Lo6wk8NAjP9JqqxUCprBB9l71RAWm7AvKIByMaFlmpoHaEEAyaNkdl ud847qh+lfC4i5lm6j5iauH6Dma1ge+IaBbopP3c=
In-reply-to:	<[email protected]>
References:	<[email protected]>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

> Does WSPR15 really achieve anything that WSPR2 does not?

oh yes! The SNR limit of wspr-2 is about -29 dB in 2.5kHz whereas wspr-15 can look down to -38 dB. If you browse the database for LF last night and sort by distance, you'll find many TA decodes for DK7FC, almost all of them with SNR values well into the 30ies.

It's certainly worthwhile to invest in frequency stability, even more so if you are running low ERP.

Best 73,

Markus (DF6NM)

----- Original Message -----

From: g3zjo

To: [email protected]

Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2013 11:33 AM

Subject: LF: WSPR2-15 600m

Hi LF

I am not stable enough, or is it the radio, to run WSPR15 on 600m.

For those stations that can / do it would not be easy to run WSPR2 and
WSPR15 at the same time, within those limits is anyone seriously
studying the results.

Does WSPR15 really achieve anything that WSPR2 does not?

Eddie G3ZJO

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: WSPR2-15 600m, g3zjo LF: Re: WSPR2-15 600m, Markus Vester <= Re: LF: Re: WSPR2-15 600m, g3zjo

Previous by Date:	LF: WSPR2-15 600m, g3zjo
Next by Date:	LF: VK1DSH reception in France WSPR 2 on 630m, André Guyé
Previous by Thread:	LF: WSPR2-15 600m, g3zjo
Next by Thread:	Re: LF: Re: WSPR2-15 600m, g3zjo
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]