Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+WSPR\s+or\s+QRSS\:\s+which\s+is\s+better\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+WSPR\s+or\s+QRSS\:\s+which\s+is\s+better\?\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: WSPR or QRSS: which is better? (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:10:53 +0000; Dinosaur! ;-) ned ludd of radio! Just teasing Mal! Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device From: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]> Sender: [email protected] Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-08/msg00119.html (12,741 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Re: WSPR or QRSS: which is better? (score: 1): Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 23:16:17 +0100; So age is not the reciprocal of whit then ? From: mal hamilton Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 5:17 PM To: [email protected] [email protected] Subject: Re: LF: Re: WSPR or QRSS; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-08/msg00239.html (15,235 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Re: WSPR or QRSS: which is better? (score: 1): Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 17:17:16 +0100; Jim It looks more like a message from a GOOSEBERRY!!!!!!!!!!!!!! g3kev -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] [email protected] To: [email protected] rsgb_lf_group@bl; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-08/msg00244.html (14,045 bytes)
4. LF: Re: WSPR or QRSS: which is better? (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 18:13:33 +0100; Dear Roger, LF Group, From watching off-air signals, I would agree with Andy that WSPR and QRSS3 have roughly equal "sensitivity". But it depends also on band conditions. For example, on 500kHz a QRS; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-08/msg00633.html (12,466 bytes)
5. LF: Re: WSPR or QRSS: which is better? (score: 1): Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:57:08 +0100; Roger QRS is always better than wspr. Only one level of demodulation needed, just read the dots/dashes as displayed on screen, whereas wspr and other similar data modes need further demodulation, for; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-08/msg00808.html (11,437 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]