Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+WOLF\s+BEACON\s+502\.800\s+\-\s+M0BMU\s+WOLF\s+beacon\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+WOLF\s+BEACON\s+502\.800\s+\-\s+M0BMU\s+WOLF\s+beacon\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: WOLF BEACON 502.800 - M0BMU WOLF beacon (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:25:35 +0100; Dear Graham, LF Group, Decoding your WOLF signal now - frequency appears to be 502.7980kHz, which is quite a long way off nominal for this mode. It could be down to either TX frequency accuracy, or s; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-01/msg00304.html (14,952 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Re: WOLF BEACON 502.800 - M0BMU WOLF beacon (score: 1): Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:30:28 +0000; Jim, I will run the M0BMU beacon again tonight from approximately 2230utc, WOLF 10 mode, 503.800kHz. Any reports would be welcome. Nothing from last night. Will be watching for at least part of this; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-01/msg00376.html (12,245 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]