Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Venezuela\s+LF\s+grabber\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Venezuela\s+LF\s+grabber\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: Venezuela LF grabber (score: 1): Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 17:50:51 +0100; Yes it looks impressive and a few years back it was also like that on CW QSO mode. So what has happened ??? Since the introduction of DATA modes on LF most Radio Operators have left and gone back to; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00273.html (9,323 bytes)
2. LF: Re: Venezuela LF grabber (score: 1): Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 17:46:56 +0100; Yes Stefan Too many distractions MODES and BANDS and not enough Operators suitably equipped to go round especially in QSO MODE Years back when I transmitted on CW or QRSS I nearly always got a respon; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00535.html (9,857 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]