Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+VLF\s+reception\s+\-\s+easily\s+mistaken\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+VLF\s+reception\s+\-\s+easily\s+mistaken\!\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: VLF reception - easily mistaken! (score: 1): Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 01:42:16 +0100; Hi Roger yes this is an old one. The thing is that most of the weak very steady frequency lines one sees one cannot afford to ID by just the frequency but it is one bit of data. I have found in the p; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00611.html (12,948 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]