Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+US\s+500\-kHz\s+band\s+plan\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: US 500-kHz band plan (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 20:42:16 +0100
Jim, Emails have crossed in the system hi. I note the reply , re USA operating frequency's The large gap in frequency made itself apparent at the time of my first post , but with the availability of
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00005.html (13,081 bytes)

2. LF: Re: US 500-kHz band plan (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 23:01:31 +0100
Dear LF Group, So, as far as trans-atlantic band-plans are concerned: It appears that there isn't actually a common frequency range that all stations on both sides of the Atlantic could use for WSPR
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00027.html (11,705 bytes)

3. LF: Re: US 500-kHz band plan (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:14:42 +0100
Dear LF Group, I still haven't replied to Fritz Raab, W1FR, regarding the WD2XSH US band plan which he is apparently coordinating - you may remember I posted the US proposals, which he sent me, a cou
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00050.html (13,486 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Re: US 500-kHz band plan (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:30:53 +0100
Dear Graham, LF Group, As the European allocation looks to be wider than the Uk, are we expecting the UK 3 Khz allocation to remain as is, if and when the band is formalised ?, in which case loosing
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00183.html (16,561 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Re: US 500-kHz band plan (score: 1)
Author: Gary - G4WGT <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:25:59 +0100
Graham, Jim LF, I agree with Graham that if the 500 kHz band remains at this small 3 kHz allocation and as the number of operators is likely to continue to increase then it would be wise to restrict
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00260.html (19,623 bytes)

6. LF: Re: US 500-kHz band plan (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:53:05 +0100
Dear Warren, Band plans aside, do all the various WD/WE stations have access to the same basic frequency range? Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00423.html (10,804 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Re: US 500-kHz band plan (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:02:19 -0400
Jim, LF group <2 cents> If T/A is of interest it seems like a three frequency slot system would be benificial. slot 1) EU beacons (not attempting a QSO) slot 2) USA beacons (not attempting a QSO) slo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00484.html (12,651 bytes)

8. Re: LF: Re: US 500-kHz band plan (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:40:35 +0100
Sorry, pressed "send" too soon by accident! Dear Graham, LF Group, As the European allocation looks to be wider than the Uk, are we expecting the UK 3 Khz allocation to remain as is, if and when the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00549.html (11,931 bytes)

9. Re: LF: Re: US 500-kHz band plan (score: 1)
Author: Warren Ziegler <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:25:32 -0400
I agree with Jay's points. I would like to remind all that WE2XGR stations are authorized for two-way QSOs with amateur stations whilst WD2XSH are not authorized for two-way communications with amate
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00619.html (14,634 bytes)

10. Re: LF: Re: US 500-kHz band plan (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 20:21:53 +0100
That seems to be a reasonable situation Jim ?. After running the wspr system for a considerable time, with the 504 carrier in the pass band, it seems 'not' to cause false decodes as I originally fear
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00698.html (17,788 bytes)

11. Re: LF: Re: US 500-kHz band plan (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:09:27 +0100
Jim, I did post a email on this a short while ago, Gus , I thin was the only one to respond and subsequently lowered his operating frequency to fall inside the , set 502.4 usb dial frequency in use i
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00727.html (15,284 bytes)

12. Re: LF: Re: US 500-kHz band plan (score: 1)
Author: Warren Ziegler <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:57:14 -0400
Hi Jim, to the same No, WD2XSH has 495-510; WE2XGR has 505-515 and most of the rest just 505-510kHz. 73 Warren K2ORS WD2XGJ WD2XSH/23 WE2XEB/2 WE2XGR/1
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00801.html (11,481 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu