Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Testing\s+now\s+a\s+new\s+RX\s+antenna\s+on\s+MF\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Testing\s+now\s+a\s+new\s+RX\s+antenna\s+on\s+MF\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: Testing now a new RX antenna on MF (score: 1): Author: André Guyé <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 19:08:44 +0200; Hello dear Domenico. The coupling system is very classic : At the base of each vertical, the impedance is about 25 3400j (including the 25 Ohms of ground rod resistance). I match that to a 50 Ohms RG; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-08/msg00030.html (15,083 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Re: Testing now a new RX antenna on MF (score: 1): Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 10:49:15 +0200; Hello Andy, MF/LF, Very good!! I see you also like playing in the garden ;-) And i like to see that my daytime signal is of some use for others. Interesting results. Now, how do the 2 verticals perfo; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-08/msg00031.html (17,498 bytes)
3. LF: Re: Testing now a new RX antenna on MF (score: 1): Author: Guyé André <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 11:48:45 +0200; Hello Stefan. I just start my RX now, hunting at your signal. Ill test the both antennas K9AY (in the 4 possible directions) and the 2 els out of phase verticals, to see the diferences. On day time y; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-08/msg00032.html (12,911 bytes)
4. LF: Re: Testing now a new RX antenna on MF (score: 1): Author: André Guyé <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2014 10:55:43 +0200; Hello Stefan, Ill try many other tests to day and saturday at day time, including a 45° change in the K9AY direction of the 4 support wires ; an extra relay system to use only one of the two out of p; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-08/msg00039.html (14,102 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]