Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+TA\.\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+TA\.\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: TA. (score: 1): Author: "Dexter McIntyre W4DEX" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 00:57:49 +0000; Thanks Peter. Looking great! Live updates at: http://www.w4dex.com/argo/135khz.htm Dex OK, now on135922.1 according to the frequency counter Regards, Peter, G3LDO; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-02/msg00005.html (9,979 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Re: TA. (score: 1): Author: "Dexter McIntyre W4DEX" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 00:14:14 +0000; Peter, I believe your signal is visible here in NC but it is so close to my local loran line at 135921.053 kHz it's hard to tell for sure. Could you possible bump the freq up a tad? Dex Transmitting; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-02/msg00006.html (9,595 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Re: TA. (score: 1): Author: "Brian Rogerson" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 09:11:22 +0000; Have just checked my record and Joe was perhaps an optimistic M between 06:00 and 07:30utc. 73, Brian, CT1DRP In spite of your reduced erp I got a complete call on the Argo grab between 0330 and 0400; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-02/msg00059.html (10,651 bytes)
4. Re: LF: Re: TA. (score: 1): Author: "g3ldo" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 09:29:48 +0100; Peter, Got you on both frequencies. Good copy. I replied on 137.777 but guess the antenna is still too low. Joe In spite of your reduced erp I got a complete call on the Argo grab between 0330 and 04; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-02/msg00097.html (10,355 bytes)
5. Re: LF: Re: TA. (score: 1): Author: "g3ldo" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 01:35:37 +0100; Peter, I believe your signal is visible here in NC but it is so close to my local loran line at 135921.053 kHz it's hard to tell for sure. Could you possible bump the freq up a tad? OK, now on135922.; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-02/msg00099.html (9,769 bytes)
6. LF: Re: TA. (score: 1): Author: "g3ldo" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 01:02:53 +0100; Transmitting on the half hour QRSS30 135.921kHz Looking for VO1NA on the hour Regards, Peter, G3LDO; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-02/msg00100.html (9,215 bytes)
7. Re: LF: Re: TA. (score: 1): Author: "Joe Craig" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 06:48:11 -0330 (NST); Peter and group Thank-you for the report of the beacon, Peter. I'm pleasantly surprised because the aerial is well below its normal height and still snagged in trees. I guess the insulation on the wi; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-02/msg00145.html (10,097 bytes)
8. Re: LF: Re: TA. (score: 1): Author: "Joe Craig" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 22:10:44 -0330 (NST); Peter, Got you on both frequencies. Good copy. I replied on 137.777 but guess the antenna is still too low. Joe OK, now on135922.1 according to the frequency counter Regards, Peter, G3LDO; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-02/msg00146.html (10,172 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]