Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+SBL\-3\+\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: SBL-3+ (score: 1)
Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 12:16:02 +0100
Hi Rik i think Stefan wants an "easy" defined LO rejection. He will have to wind transformers for a analogue switch and get the balance right. Probably not difficult. Alan Hello Stefan, Alan, what ab
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-10/msg00017.html (13,537 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Re: SBL-3+ (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 10:48:55 +0100
Hi Alan, Thank you. Yes, i know your website from the early 2000s (as i was young) where i have read all i have found in the web ;-) Yes, a notch filter for 125 kHz is not so critical than a band pas
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-10/msg00081.html (14,020 bytes)

3. LF: Re: SBL-3+ (score: 1)
Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 23:41:23 +0100
Hi Stefan why a difficult to get mixer?? the IF port on most DBMs is DC coupled so feed the siganl in there and (i presume) mix up ?? Or is the RF/LO response still too high on the easily available o
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-10/msg00087.html (10,815 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Re: SBL-3+ (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 10:02:54 +0000
Use a fast bus switch like the FS3125, and you may get a slightly better performance than HCMOS can offer.     You could adapt the mixer from this upconverter design http://www.g4jnt.com/LFUpconv.pdf
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-10/msg00102.html (15,410 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Re: SBL-3+ (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 10:54:50 +0100
Hi Rik, Very interesting! Looks easy, almost perfect. But i don't know what is the "best" solution now. It gets confusing the more solutions become available. Probably each method can achieve optimal
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-10/msg00123.html (12,916 bytes)

6. RE: LF: Re: SBL-3+ (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 10:42:10 +0100
Hello Stefan, Alan, what about a CMOS analog switch mixer ? Cheap and easy to find. I used a 74HC4053 as mixer in my 3.5MHz to 500kHz transverter. Have a look at http://home4.swipnet.se/~w-41522/lfco
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-10/msg00372.html (12,535 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Re: SBL-3+ (score: 1)
Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 00:32:00 +0100
Hi Stefan No, you are right you do need low frequency paths on both sides of the mixer. I have a "lateral" approach to technical questions which starts by saying "why do you want to do it that way"!
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-10/msg00440.html (13,543 bytes)

8. Re: LF: Re: SBL-3+ (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 00:59:29 +0200
Hi Alan, I want to try an alternative to the BF981 which runs in my current LF grabber RX. It downconverts 137 kHz to 12 kHz and feeds the soundcard with this 12 kHz signal. It is running not too bad
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-10/msg00558.html (11,336 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu