Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Ringing\s+Voltage\s+on\s+Telephone\s+\,\s+boo\-boo\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: Ringing Voltage on Telephone , boo-boo (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Brown" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 16:17:41 +1300
Here in ZL the line voltage (nominally 50) is reversed behind the low freq ringing as well- lotsa PBXs use the line reversal these days and not the actual low freq ringing signal- makes for faster ca
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00334.html (10,199 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Re: Ringing Voltage on Telephone , boo-boo (score: 1)
Author: "BOB RIESE" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 21:37:34 -0500
Well In Pennsylvania Verizon The ring freq consists of 5 tones to handle 5 party lines and or 10 party reverse side ringing ( No more ,,,not sure if we have any other than 2 party lines ) 16, 25, 33,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00344.html (10,390 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Re: Ringing Voltage on Telephone , boo-boo (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 19:06:19 -0500
Have you actually looked? Yessir... I'm in the telcom equipment business. I'm not claiming that you're wrong, Larry... just that the normal U.S. ringing signal is plain old 20 Hz AC. John Andrews, W
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00345.html (9,577 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Re: Ringing Voltage on Telephone , boo-boo (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Kayser" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 17:57:10 -0500
Larry, I'm with John Davis on this one. The U.S. practice is 20 Hz for ringing -- nothing at 1 kHz. John Andrews, W1TAG personally it may
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00346.html (9,753 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Re: Ringing Voltage on Telephone , boo-boo (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 11:57:26 -0500
Larry, I'm with John Davis on this one. The U.S. practice is 20 Hz for ringing -- nothing at 1 kHz. John Andrews, W1TAG Larry, I have done. My statement was based on having checked it personally on a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00349.html (9,543 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Re: Ringing Voltage on Telephone , boo-boo (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 10:23:08 EST
<< both these are wrong. Go and get a scope and have a look. >> Larry, I have done. My statement was based on having checked it personally on a number of Bell and non-Bell exchanges over the years. A
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00350.html (8,792 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Re: Ringing Voltage on Telephone , boo-boo (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Kayser" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 08:28:39 -0500
Gentlemen: Same in the UK and both these are wrong. Go and get a scope and have a look. The proper designation of ringing induction from CO to Callee (a telephone term differentiating Caller [the ori
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00354.html (9,443 bytes)

8. RE: LF: Re: Ringing Voltage on Telephone , boo-boo (score: 1)
Author: "Talbot Andrew" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2001 10:12:04 +0100
Same in the UK. Ring voltage is a low frequency bipolar spike waveform of a 100V or so amplitude, Originally designed to hit the bells firmly, the waveform seems to have been kept for legacy reasons.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00357.html (9,843 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu