Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+CQ\s+WW\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+CQ\s+WW\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: Re: CQ WW (score: 1): Author: Scott Tilley <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 10:59:23 -0800; Hi Mal and group Yes the chance of an EU reception on the west coast is remote but not impossible as evidenced by the reception of VY1JA in Germany in 2006. There's nothing to prevent your QSO skeds; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-02/msg00484.html (16,740 bytes)
2. LF: Re: Re: Re: Re: CQ WW (score: 1): Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 15:01:20 +0100; Jay At the time I was against the move because as you say it worked well for years and why change for one person. In future to suit the majority of USA stations I will TX on 136.318 Khz and will be o; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-02/msg00701.html (12,679 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]