Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+500kHz\s+WSPR\s+Beacon\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+500kHz\s+WSPR\s+Beacon\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: Re: Re: 500kHz WSPR Beacon (score: 1): Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 00:43:56 +0100; It looks like ur cycle is 2 mins on TX and 2mins RX. If I had this mode I am sure we could have a qso. Your sig at times strong. Your sig is strong enough for a CW QRS QSO Mal/G3KEV Jim I'm running W; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-12/msg00265.html (13,558 bytes)
2. LF: Re: Re: Re: 500kHz WSPR Beacon (score: 1): Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 00:39:27 +0100; Jay I can see a trace on ur qrg that started 2332 ended 2334 utc, this is probably u but I cannot decode it using SpecJT ur sig is back agn at 2336 some qsb stops 2338 utc de mal/g3kev Jim I'm runnin; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-12/msg00475.html (13,578 bytes)
3. LF: Re: Re: Re: 500kHz WSPR Beacon (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 02:20:04 +0100; Dear Jay, LF Group, Now getting "good" message from WE2XGR, with correct locator square and power - after some fiddling around with PCs, I also seem to be uploading spots into the WSPRnet.org databas; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-12/msg00508.html (11,629 bytes)
4. LF: Re: Re: Re: 500kHz WSPR Beacon (score: 1): Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 13:11:24 +0100; Jay You are correct in your observations. WSPR is not a productive mode. Using CW and variations thereof would achieve better results in a lot less time and effort, and overall is not suited to the m; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-12/msg00653.html (14,874 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]