Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+PhaseScope\s+beta\s+1\.0\s+release\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+PhaseScope\s+beta\s+1\.0\s+release\.\.\.\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: Re: PhaseScope beta 1.0 release... (score: 1): Author: "Murray ZL1BPU" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 12:22:29 +1200; Dave, There are two issues here - first, the signal being on a non-integer frequency, and second, the signal having a non-GPS locked carrier phase. The first can be handled by setting a non-integer o; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-04/msg00078.html (12,109 bytes)
2. LF: Re: Re: PhaseScope beta 1.0 release... (score: 1): Author: "Murray ZL1BPU" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 09:03:57 +1200; I'm about to have a play with Scott's new PhaseScope, but I can tell you that I have been getting very good results using another program based on the same technique, also using Peter's clever ideas.; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-04/msg00079.html (10,853 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]