Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+Near\s+field\s+effects\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+Near\s+field\s+effects\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: Re: Near field effects (score: 1): Author: "Dave Brown" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2001 10:10:44 +1200; snip However, this is for a short, basically E field, antenna. My gut feeling is that a magnetic antenna such as a loop would behave in the opposite way and the H field would roll off much faster tha; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-07/msg00109.html (8,547 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]