Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | LF: Re: Re: Near field effects |
| From: | "Dave Brown" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Sun, 15 Jul 2001 10:10:44 +1200 |
| References: | <001601c10cae$921cfa60$b48c01d4@g4jnt> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | <[email protected]> |
----- Original Message ----- From: Andrew Talbot <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2001 9:47 AM Subject: LF: Re: Near field effects snip However, this is for a short, basically E field, antenna. My gut feeling is that a magnetic antenna such as a loop would behave in the opposite way and the H field would roll off much faster than the E field. snip I'm fairly sure you're correct Andy- and I think there's an excellent summary statement of all this in the first chapter or two of that EMC measurements book that Marconi put out a few years back. 73 Dave, ZL3FJ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: Re: Near field effects, Andrew Talbot |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: Re: re 9kHz NOVs, Andrew Talbot |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: Near field effects, Andrew Talbot |
| Next by Thread: | LF: Re: re 9kHz NOVs, Andrew Talbot |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |