Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+First\s+WOLF\s+QSO\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+First\s+WOLF\s+QSO\!\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: Re: First WOLF QSO! (score: 1): Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:11:36 +0100; Hi Ed, as John says, I do not recall any two-way WOLF qsos. I think only Jim M0BMU, Andy G4JNT have transmit it, that I can remember. It is basically an "off-line" decoding system, where with weak si; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-01/msg00043.html (11,782 bytes)
2. LF: Re: Re: First WOLF QSO! (score: 1): Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:01:49 +0100; Ed, US's Lowfers have saved wide experience in reception of very weak signals on LF - when already they will appear on 136 or 160-190kHz for longway 2-way QSO with high-grade ERP? The proposal for an; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-01/msg00257.html (10,157 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]