Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+Dutch\s+ham\s+are\s+back\s+on\s+600m\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+Dutch\s+ham\s+are\s+back\s+on\s+600m\!\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: Re: Dutch ham are back on 600m! (score: 1): Author: pa3abk <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 23:15:02 +0200; Unfortunately I was somewhat too enthousiastic in my publication. Didn't read the fine print which came after the announcement. I'm afraid that Albert is right regarding the extra delay. Somewhere is; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-07/msg00029.html (10,239 bytes)
2. LF: Re: Re: Dutch ham are back on 600m! (score: 1): Author: "Albert" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 09:55:02 +0200; My understanding of this Dutch publication differs. Freq. range 501 - 505 kHz, entry date somewhere in Oktober (after EU-publication and 3 months standstill in Brussels) 73, Albert PA0A; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-07/msg00254.html (9,416 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]