Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+CFA\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+CFA\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: RE: CFA (score: 1): Author: "Steve Olney" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 15 Nov 1999 08:12:42 +1100; G'day All, IMHO, I think it would be wise to wait until the Isle of Man transmitter is tested. Am I wrong but doesn't the latest coverage map from the IoM site look a lot smaller than the old one? 73; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-11/msg00074.html (8,644 bytes)
2. LF: Re: Re: CFA (score: 1): Author: "PY3CRX PY2PLL" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2001 13:57:30 -0300; I´ve been reading about CFA on Antennex since 1999 and the controversy still there. Most of the experimenters that published some design abandoned the projects. We can feel this because the CFA´s rel; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-08/msg00181.html (9,391 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]