Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+CE\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+CE\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: Re: CE (score: 1): Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 13:37:17 -0400; It would seem to me that just sending one's callsign followed by "K" would be an invitation for anyone to go ahead. The "K" would differentiate this from a beacon where no command is given. John Andr; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-04/msg00207.html (8,600 bytes)
2. LF: Re: Re: CE (score: 1): Author: "Johan Bodin" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 21:26:00 +0200; Why not GE which could stand for general enquiry and is one dot shorter.! Laurie Good idea but it can be confused with Good Evening. Why not just G9XYZ dah-di-dah-di-dah? Like K and A put together. K; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-04/msg00212.html (8,821 bytes)
3. LF: Re: Re: CE (score: 1): Author: "Dave Pick" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 19:50:41 +0100; Or how about "EE", short for 'ello 'ello? Dave G3YXM. If anyone has an opinion on the above for or against pse comment. On normal CW I wll continue with the established CQ. 73 de G3KEV/IO94SH Why not; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-04/msg00214.html (8,658 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]