Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+BBC\s+R4\s+LW\s+\"Frequency\s+Standard\"\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+BBC\s+R4\s+LW\s+\"Frequency\s+Standard\"\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: Re: BBC R4 LW "Frequency Standard" (score: 1): Author: "captbrian" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 07:54:59 +0100; My 2 - penn'orth is that from frequent observation [reception in moving car ] R4 LW ceases very abruptly at Lyon. --Original Message-- From: flo flo <[email protected]> To: rsgb_lf_group; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-08/msg00044.html (14,552 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Re: Re: BBC R4 LW "Frequency Standard" (score: 1): Author: "flo flo" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 12:41:50 -0800; ...and R4 is pretty weak here in Alaska too compared with its Eureopean counterparts across the Marche/channel (often some 20-30 dBs stronger) - Ive only managed to listen to cricket test match speci; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-08/msg00046.html (13,397 bytes)
3. LF: Re: Re: BBC R4 LW "Frequency Standard" (score: 1): Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 20:30:48 +0100; Hi Hugh, yes I supose it would have some effect. The advantage is that all the transmitters are under "atomic" control so there is almost a continuous phase difference between their carriers. The "mu; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-08/msg00047.html (11,848 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]