Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+RE\:\s+Re\:\s+G3XIZ\s+\-\s+1000\s+th\s+MF\s+QSO\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+RE\:\s+Re\:\s+G3XIZ\s+\-\s+1000\s+th\s+MF\s+QSO\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: RE: Re: G3XIZ - 1000 th MF QSO (score: 1): Author: "DENNIS EASTERLING" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:36:25 +0100; Hi Rik I really did open a can of worms, least said now soonest mended hi. Thanks for the offer of crystals but I can manage ok. 73 Dennis M0JXM Hi Dennis, WSPR outside the 504.000 - 503.800 segment; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-11/msg00052.html (17,138 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Re: RE: Re: G3XIZ - 1000 th MF QSO (score: 1): Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:29:52 +0100; Hi Dennis, WSPR outside the 504.000 - 503.800 segment makes little sense, so a possible QSY can be only 100 Hz or so. But what xtal frequencies do you need to get away from the top end of the band? I; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-11/msg00339.html (16,187 bytes)
3. LF: Re: RE: Re: G3XIZ - 1000 th MF QSO (score: 1): Author: "DENNIS EASTERLING" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:23:41 +0100; Hi Jim I was speaking figuratively as you are so near and on my xtl frequency. My comment was directed at Chris' statment in email subject1000 QSOs, who also suffers and others who have complained ab; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-11/msg00412.html (22,289 bytes)
4. LF: Re: Re: Re: G3XIZ - 1000 th MF QSO (score: 1): Author: "Chris" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:43:15 +0100; Hi Mal, Some while ago when I commented a strong signal in the band and in beacon mode was causing me problems, you quickly told me I was talking nonsense, saying I wouldn't have such problems if I h; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-11/msg00592.html (17,374 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]