Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+RE\:\s+Ground\s+proximity\s+antennas\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: RE: Ground proximity antennas (score: 1)
Author: Steve Dove <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:15:37 +0000
... except the ones you couldn't hear. Beverages are not efficient on RX either but have directional advantages. I have never missed any DX signals by not having one. G3KEV
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-10/msg00033.html (10,168 bytes)

2. LF: Re: RE: Ground proximity antennas (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 12:54:09 +0100
Beverages are not efficient on RX either but have directional advantages. I have never missed any DX signals by not having one. G3KEV -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] Rik Stro
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-10/msg00097.html (11,881 bytes)

3. LF: Re: Re: Ground proximity antennas (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:48:43 +0100
Jim I am sure a beverage would perform over good ground but to what degree would it be less efficient than over poor ground. Any bit of metal, wire etc will radiate something like the proberbial bed
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-10/msg00298.html (12,061 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Re: RE: Ground proximity antennas (score: 1)
Author: John Rabson <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 09:20:33 +0200
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-10/msg00321.html (10,614 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Re: RE: Ground proximity antennas (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:26:32 +0100
I know exactly what DX is about, you only have to listen on a band and hear the others working/calling the DX. I have never failed to hear what others were hearing in fact I often copied better than
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-10/msg00400.html (10,566 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Re: RE: Ground proximity antennas (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:55:30 +0100
A couple of weeks ago you referred to the 9 kcs band as a CrackPot band, hardly encouraging for those dedicated to having fun dreaming on that frequency g3kev -- Original Message -- From: sthed475@te
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-10/msg00481.html (13,877 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Re: RE: Ground proximity antennas (score: 1)
Author: Scott Tilley <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 19:22:12 +0000
No, I referred to your 'idea' of experimenting with high frequency audio as 'crackpot', not VLF radio... Actually, I've been highly supportive of Stefan's work and communicate with him regularly. Unl
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-10/msg00686.html (16,797 bytes)

8. Re: LF: Re: RE: Ground proximity antennas (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 01:08:19 +0100
Its very quiet on VLF at present. Have they all gone UNDERGROUND ????? g3kev -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] Scott Tilley To: [email protected] [email protected]
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-10/msg00688.html (16,827 bytes)

9. Re: LF: Re: RE: Ground proximity antennas (score: 1)
Author: Scott Tilley <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:40:46 +0000
Didn't you miss Stefan's last 8970 signal and log the neighbour's toaster instead? On 10/13/2010 11:54 AM, mal hamilton wrote: Beverages are not efficient on RX either but have directional advantages
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-10/msg00740.html (13,338 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu