Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+RE\:\s+Anyone\s+using\s+a\s+magnetic\s+loop\s+for\s+136\s+Khz\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+RE\:\s+Anyone\s+using\s+a\s+magnetic\s+loop\s+for\s+136\s+Khz\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: RE: Anyone using a magnetic loop for 136 Khz? (score: 1): Author: "Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 15:57:13; I have not seen any info on multiturn magloops. Please help I am very interested. Hello Paul, I remember a discussion on this reflector about multiturn loops. When I rember well the conclusion was th; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00139.html (9,512 bytes)
2. LF: Re: RE: Anyone using a magnetic loop for 136 Khz? (score: 1): Author: "Paul A. Cianciolo" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 09:56:26 -0400; Andy, Thanks for the response!!!!! WOW ! Do you still have a copy of the spreadsheet? I would love to see a copy. It seems like 10 Db down was not so bad considering how small the loop was. I have th; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00141.html (13,269 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]