Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+PA0SE\s+Field\s+Strength\s+Meter\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+PA0SE\s+Field\s+Strength\s+Meter\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: PA0SE Field Strength Meter (score: 1): Author: "Dick Rollema" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 14:33:05 +0200; From PA0SE to All Dick's field strength meter looks interesting - well done Dick. Not sure whether it would detect much of my QRPP set up at 1km! The DVM I use with my FSM indicates voltages less tha; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-07/msg00060.html (13,841 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Re: PA0SE Field Strength Meter (score: 1): Author: "Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 15:59:56; There are two factors to be considered, sensitivity and selectivity. A dc-receiver can be made as sensitive as a superhet. ... I think that a third factor has te be considered, especially on LF : the; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-07/msg00061.html (9,198 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]