Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Opera\s+\-\s+initial\s+thoughts\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Opera\s+\-\s+initial\s+thoughts\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: Opera - initial thoughts (score: 1): Author: "rn3agc" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 16:33:49 +0400; Hi Mike, No DX reports have been receved, although well-equipped stations in UA and W have been active. Possibly, you mean also my station. I will clear a situation. The grabber in KO86NP works with; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-01/msg00172.html (12,115 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Re: Opera - initial thoughts (score: 1): Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 17:10:04 +0100; OK, Andrey, all understood. 73 de Mike ==; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-01/msg00308.html (12,226 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Re: Opera - initial thoughts (score: 1): Author: Dexter McIntyre W4DEX <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:32:04 +0000; James Moritz wrote: I think the current down-sides are: -The "black box" nature of the package - not knowing what it is you are using, what it is doing (especially via the internet), having few contr; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-01/msg00701.html (9,801 bytes)
4. LF: Re: Opera - initial thoughts (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:59:35 +0100; Dear Mike, LF Group, Is it better than QRSS? It *is* QRSS8 (in Op32 mode), only instead of morse code, it uses an error-correcting code of some sort, details closely guarded by Mr. Ros. However, I ha; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-01/msg00882.html (13,078 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]