Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+MSK\s+etc\s+and\s+stability\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: MSK etc and stability (score: 1)
Author: Alberto di Bene <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 16:18:05 +0100
Hi Alan, Jim, Andy, Bill, Wolf, etc. etc. just a few wild thougths on the subject, which haven't been thoroughly analyzed, but this is what the collective mind of this forum is meant for, isn't it ?
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-11/msg00247.html (11,747 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Re: MSK etc and stability (score: 1)
Author: Bill de Carle <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 11:34:29 -0500
At 04:18 PM 11/27/2004 +0100, Alberto wrote: [..] I was thinking of a scheme more or less like the following, for the 137 kHz scenario, for demodulating a BPSK transmission. [..] A PC program can now
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-11/msg00248.html (10,966 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Re: MSK etc and stability (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 12:05:54 -0500
Greetings all, Alberto Firstly, I like the idea of Andy, of a GSPSK (Gentle Sloping PSK), which should substantially reduce the amplitude variations of the signal, when subject to phase modulation. A
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-11/msg00249.html (9,145 bytes)

4. LF: Re: MSK etc and stability (score: 1)
Author: Alberto di Bene <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 19:05:54 +0100
This is basically how the "PSKL" mode in COHERENT/AFRICA was done. Hmmm Bill, this mean I cannot patent it, being yours a "prior art" ? :-) Seriously talking, bad performance under weak signal condi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-11/msg00250.html (9,294 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Re: MSK etc and stability (score: 1)
Author: Bill de Carle <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 17:02:59 -0500
This is basically how the "PSKL" mode in COHERENT/AFRICA was done. Hmmm Bill, this mean I cannot patent it, being yours a "prior art" ? :-) Seriously talking, bad performance under weak signal condi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-11/msg00251.html (12,531 bytes)

6. LF: Re: MSK etc and stability (score: 1)
Author: Alberto di Bene <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 18:36:43 +0100
Well, I did it a little differently, so maybe on a technicality you could patent it :-) Good, so you won't sue me ! :-) Thanks for the details of your implementation. Just let me ask one question. Y
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-11/msg00262.html (10,045 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu