Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: MSK etc and stability

To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: Re: MSK etc and stability
From: Alberto di Bene <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 18:36:43 +0100
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <000b01c4d3fc$f0716880$6507a8c0@Main> <000b01c4d3fc$f0716880$6507a8c0@Main> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103)
Bill de Carle wrote:

Well, I did it a little differently, so maybe on a technicality
you could patent it :-)

Good, so you won't sue me !  :-)
Thanks for the details of your implementation. Just let me ask one question. You multiply the input real signal with a phasor rotating at the same nominal frequency F of the signal The output is a DC signal and a signal at +-2F (the sign depends on the direction of rotation of the phasor). At this point you need a lowpass filter, which you have implemented integrating the I & Q output. Wouldn't maybe a very steep FIR filter (> 255 taps) with
a bandwidth of a 2 or 3 Hz gain you something in terms of SNR ?
Mind, I am not saying this based on some computations, it's just a feeling (which may, and
probably will) be wrong.

73  Alberto  I2PHD




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>