Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Locator\s+program\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Locator\s+program\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: Locator program (score: 1): Author: "captbrian" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 19:15:20 +0100; If you want to communicate with navigators in general and not just radio-hams then , then Lat. Long. seems obvious in view of universal GPS users Bryan Over the years I have encountered a number of l; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-02/msg00334.html (8,768 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Re: Locator program (score: 1): Author: "John Rabson" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:13:33 +0000; Thanks for the suggestion. Most of the people I shall be dealing with will be radio amateurs, but I raised the question because I have noticed, particularly on 5MHz, that people exchange locator refe; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-02/msg00369.html (9,589 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Re: Locator program (score: 1): Author: "captbrian" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:57:10 +0100; I do not tell others what to do but it has never been clear to me why radio amateurs need a separate system for defining geographical position from that used by the rest of the population unless it i; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-02/msg00371.html (10,230 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]