Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Inv\s+L\s+\'FAN\'\s+top\s+wires\s+\?\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. LF: RE: Inv L 'FAN' top wires ? (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 06:17:54 +0000
If you can keep the 20 Ft wire at the same hight (or more) as the existing 40 FT wire it will improve the antenna: 1. Larger Cant = less loading coil = less losses in the coil 2. better current distr
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-12/msg00177.html (11,866 bytes)

2. LF: Re: Inv L 'FAN' top wires ? (score: 1)
Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 12:46:30 +0100
Hi Graham, this will increase the aerial capacity by around 100 to 120pF provided the new wires are not over/close to lossy foliage/buildings, as the new wires are only the same length as the current
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-12/msg00203.html (12,824 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Re: Inv L 'FAN' top wires ? (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 22:20:31 +0100
Thanks Alan , Rick There is a slope down from the top of the Ae , the side view is about right , I have the ideas that with the fan, the signal from the 'back' may be lower due to screening caused by
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-12/msg00674.html (14,067 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Re: Inv L 'FAN' top wires ? (score: 1)
Author: M0FMT <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 21:13:48 +0000 (GMT)
Hi Graham Probably better to put your efforts into making it higher ? 73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX On Tuesday, 3 December 2013, 11:25, Alan Melia <[email protected]> wrote: Hi Graham, this will
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-12/msg00675.html (15,186 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Re: Inv L 'FAN' top wires ? (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 23:05:29 +0100
Err NCD on that one Pete , the last 'refurbishment' of the pole , attracted evil spirits ...so at 2x 20 2 inch alloy scaffold poles , that's as good as it get's ! 73-G, From: M0FMT Sent: Tuesday, Dec
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-12/msg00676.html (15,193 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Re: Inv L 'FAN' top wires ? (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 23:50:32 +0100
I could re make the 2 wire top , that was 3 ft spacing , wind loading is high though .. G, From: [email protected] Alan Melia Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2013 10:14 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@black
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-12/msg00677.html (17,876 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Re: Inv L 'FAN' top wires ? (score: 1)
Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 23:50:34 +0100
Hi Graham I think that the addition will prove a worthwhile improvement. Try and get the wires over 700mm apart as soon as possible leaving the pole ....use a spreadder ?? stopping the wires at 20ft
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-12/msg00678.html (17,341 bytes)

8. Re: LF: Re: Inv L 'FAN' top wires ? (score: 1)
Author: M0FMT <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 22:35:03 +0000 (GMT)
Graham and extra pole is not unreasonable or by adding a smaller diam. light weight pole 20ft on top. Check it out another 'S' point (or thereabouts) for free? Paint it mottled blue and the neighbour
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-12/msg00679.html (18,134 bytes)

9. Re: LF: Re: Inv L 'FAN' top wires ? (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 02:20:35 +0100
, well at 40 ft + the insulated base , making 46 ft above the ground , I think its high enough ! , its only a few feet from the back wall , so guying is a problem with the shallow angle ..... I may b
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-12/msg00680.html (18,740 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu