, well at 40 ft + the insulated
base , making 46 ft above
the ground , I think its high enough ! , its only
a few feet from the back wall , so guying is
a problem with the shallow angle ..... I may
be able to get a triangle 40x40x10 ft base
up , quite simply , after that its a big job
73-G,
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2013 10:35 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Inv L 'FAN' top wires ?
Graham and extra pole is not unreasonable or by adding a smaller diam.
light weight pole 20ft on top. Check it out another 'S' point (or
thereabouts) for free? Paint it mottled blue and the neighbours wouldn't even
notice. You know it makes sense. GL.
73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX
Err NCD on that one Pete , the last
'refurbishment' of the pole , attracted evil spirits
...so at 2x 20 2 inch alloy scaffold poles , that's
as good as it get's !
73-G,
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2013 9:13 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Inv L 'FAN' top wires ?
Hi Graham
Probably better to put your efforts into making it higher ?
73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX
Hi Graham, this will increase the aerial capacity
by around 100 to 120pF provided the new wires are not over/close to lossy
foliage/buildings, as the new wires are only the same length as the current
wires you will see little increase in Rrad, BUT you will see a proportional
decrease in the loss resistance. So the aerial becomes more efficient......this
assumes a flat fan not a sloping one.
Approximately, doubling the antenna capacitance
halves the Rloss which is the component determining the antenna current
you can drive and hence the ERP.
Alan
G3NYK
-----
Original Message -----
Sent:
Tuesday, December 03, 2013 12:20 AM
Subject:
LF: Inv L 'FAN' top wires ?
Anyone tried this configuration ?
Changing single 40 ft top wire on
inv-L to a FAN
shape x3 40 Ft , spaced about 10 ft
at far end
TNx -G,
|