Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Frequency\s+Stability\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: Frequency Stability (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 17:52:08 +0000
You need to take into accout the frequency period over which you need stability.    A locked frequency reference used for LF has very different requirements over one used for stabilising moicrowave s
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00091.html (17,802 bytes)

2. LF: Re: Frequency Stability (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 18:10:38 +0100
Dear Ken, Wolf, LF Group, I have been playing around with the insides of a Halcyon PFS-1 Droitwich-derived frequency standard over the last few days, and some observations might be of interest. The R
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00175.html (14,432 bytes)

3. LF: Re: Frequency Stability (score: 1)
Author: "Martin Evans" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 21:10:44 +0100
To All VLF. Is the following frequency stability sufficient for Spectrum Lab: 1MHz and 10MHz derived from Radio 4 198 kHz Accuracy 2 parts in10-8 over 1 sec,2 parts in10-9 over 10secs. 73s Ken M0KHW
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00316.html (9,060 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Re: Frequency Stability (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 22:30:39 +0000
I think NPL would have something to say about that if it was really there!. Droitwich is defined as a secondary national standard; the carrier is derived from a rubidium source which is regularly com
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00483.html (12,116 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Re: Frequency Stability (score: 1)
Author: Peter Dodd <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 09:13:06 +0000
Dear James and LF group, I have one of these units but was unable to find out any info on the internet. I figured the DDS section OK and used it to set up the receiver for T/A tests some time ago. I
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00657.html (13,764 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Re: Frequency Stability (score: 1)
Author: Chris Trayner <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 21:13:07 +0000
Actually, for your communication purposes, do you need a stable frequency? If Tx and Rx both lock to BBC Radio 4 or MSF or whatever, it doesn't matter if it drifts. Both amateur Tx and Rx drift toge
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00665.html (10,425 bytes)

7. LF: Re: Frequency Stability (score: 1)
Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 22:28:14 +0100
Hi Ken The problem might be if you are deriving the frequency direct from R4 via a PLL you will have severe problems if/when the PLL unlocks due to noise or fading. The best bet is to run a loop on S
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00756.html (10,947 bytes)

8. Re: LF: Re: Frequency Stability (score: 1)
Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 22:13:18 +0100
Hi Ken, Martin, and group, I'd say yes... 8970 Hz * 2e-9 = circa 18 µHz resolution, that's fine. Even better than most soundcard's short-term oscillator stability, and the dreadful effects caused by
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00887.html (10,879 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu