Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+EH\s+Loop\s+$with\s+off\-topic\s+addendum$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+EH\s+Loop\s+$with\s+off\-topic\s+addendum$\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: EH Loop (with off-topic addendum) (score: 1): Author: "valerio gabbani" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 21:41:53 +0200; Hi Valerio, It may be interesting if you would post those details. I tried looking at the www.eh-antennas.com web site recently, and was unable to get much from it. The author is using features of Fr; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-04/msg00118.html (9,814 bytes)
2. LF: Re: EH Loop (with off-topic addendum) (score: 1): Author: "Alberto di Bene" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 18:10:28 +0200; A couple of things I did find amusing on the EH home page, however, are statements such as: "For more than 120 years all antennas have been Hertz antennas, except the Crossed Field Antenna." (I wonde; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-04/msg00136.html (9,890 bytes)
3. LF: Re: EH Loop (with off-topic addendum) (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 04:40:12 EDT; Hi John, Fantastic ! The addendum puts a bright light on all this EH-CFA-hype/nonsense which can be seen in a lot of places (even in a german radio amateur mag). About your addendum (which IMO is not; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-04/msg00142.html (8,935 bytes)
4. LF: Re: EH Loop (with off-topic addendum) (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 01:25:45 EDT; In a message dated 4/20/03 6:37:57 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [email protected] writes: It seem there is onother device for radiating on 137 kHz, it is the EH loop from the same original mind of th; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-04/msg00146.html (16,544 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]