Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+DI2AG\s+440KHz\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+DI2AG\s+440KHz\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: DI2AG 440KHz (score: 1): Author: José Manuel <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 18:17:27 +0100; Hi Walter and All: First of all, HAPPY NEW YEAR to you and for all members of the group. Copied your signals last nigth on 440.0432 kHz, best time at 1.10 UTC. Unfortunately my receiving limit on thi; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-01/msg00053.html (10,903 bytes)
2. LF: Re: DI2AG 440KHz (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 16:48:55 +0100; Well, before sending you any reliable data, I would like to be sure that the QSB is not an artefact coming from my rig. I'm presently using an ICOM IC738 as receiver and ARGO (by I2PHD/IK1as processi; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-01/msg00066.html (16,656 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Re: DI2AG 440KHz (score: 1): Author: Wolf DL4YHF <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 17:22:56 +0100; Hello Walter and Jean-Louis, The QSB on DI2AG is really QSB, nothing artificial. I have the same effect with a different software, and a different receiver. I made a sequence of screenshots on Jan 1s; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-01/msg00067.html (8,846 bytes)
4. RE: LF: Re: DI2AG 440KHz (score: 1): Author: "Gary - G4WGT" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 19:18:12 +0100; Hi Walter & LF, Same sort of fading seen here also. Regards Gary - G4WGT (IO83qp) Web: http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/wgtaylor --Original Message-- From: [email protected] [mailto:owner-; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-01/msg00071.html (9,524 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]