Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Correction\s+to\;\s+Measurement\s+of\s+loop\s+antenna\s+current\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Correction\s+to\;\s+Measurement\s+of\s+loop\s+antenna\s+current\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: Correction to; Measurement of loop antenna current (score: 1): Author: "Dave Brown" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 08:21:35 +1200; Forget the numbers I quoted re my LF loop in previous posting; in defence all I can say is I was first licensed in mid sixties and been member of RSGB since 68. Draw your own conclusions!!! For some; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-08/msg00091.html (9,308 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Re: Correction to; Measurement of loop antenna current (score: 1): Author: "Steve Rawlings" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 08:14:21 +0100; . . . The 5 ohms rf resistance I quoted was the figure for the original single loop. With conductor two conductors in parallel the figure is close to 1.25ohms. Corresponding DC figure is just over 0; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-08/msg00093.html (9,679 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]