Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+500kHz\s+qrg\s+range\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: 500kHz qrg range (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:36:58 +0100
Dave, I used to have a notch filter for radio Merseyside on 1485 , but then it started sending on other frequency's as well , so I made the high pass filter from the arral handbook .. that solved the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-08/msg00065.html (14,779 bytes)

2. LF: Re: 500kHz qrg range (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 06:48:54 +0100
In fact it is 32 times the line frequency - 15.625kHz x 32 =500kHz I do have a weakish carrier there, so that is probably what it is coming from. What puzzles me about this thread is why you need suc
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-08/msg00120.html (10,680 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Re: 500kHz qrg range (score: 1)
Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 23:56:40 +0100
Hi Dennis I guess insertion loss is fairly easy to deal with at these frequencies. Would it not be better to consider what you need to reject rather than how little to accept? This would make the tui
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-08/msg00125.html (12,058 bytes)

4. LF: Re: 500kHz qrg range (score: 1)
Author: "Ken" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:50:09 +0100
Hi Dennis. I manage quite well with a simple two reasonator filter with tapped capacitors for input and output impedance matching, response as follows, centre 501.9, 3dB, 495.8 & 508.26, 6dB, 492.77
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-08/msg00164.html (12,002 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Re: 500kHz qrg range (score: 1)
Author: "Dennis" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 23:54:59 +0200
Hi David, Jim! Thanks for Your answers! Yes, Jim, but a 3-resonator-filter seems to be the best tradeoff beetween selectivity, and my ability to tune it. Don't have any special measurement gear... ..
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-08/msg00219.html (10,199 bytes)

6. LF: Re: 500kHz qrg range (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 22:12:20 +0100
Dear Dennis, LF Group, So I ask myself and now You :) , would You say it's important to keep the full rx range from 495kHz to 510kHz and >pay the price of a worse stopband attenuation, or do You thin
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-08/msg00277.html (11,003 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu