Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+139\s+mfsk\s+signal\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+139\s+mfsk\s+signal\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: 139 mfsk signal (score: 1): Author: "Andrey rn3agc" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 11:34:10 +0100; Laurence, Markus, LF, Here last night levels of signals DCF39 and "unid mfsk" were approximately identical. Now, at 13 o'clock local time, level DCF39 is stronger on 20-25 db. For the first time I he; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-02/msg00148.html (9,230 bytes)
2. LF: Re: 139 mfsk signal (score: 1): Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00:54:10 +0100; Hi Laurence, yes, I am seeing this signal on 139.0 between the strong DCF bursts here - southeasterly direction, same as the earlier FSK signals from Turkey. Actually smack in the middle of the DCF39; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-02/msg00185.html (10,595 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]