Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+\[Lowfer\]\s+Tx\s+this\s+w\/e\s+136\.172kHz\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+\[Lowfer\]\s+Tx\s+this\s+w\/e\s+136\.172kHz\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: [Lowfer] Tx this w/e 136.172kHz (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 11:03:37 -0400; I had almost a full call sign capture in the 2300 hour. http://www.n1bug.com/g3xdv-1.jpg Bits and pieces at 0100 and 0300. I fell asleep and didn't disable my transmitter for the 0500 hour but I coul; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-03/msg00271.html (11,542 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Re: [Lowfer] Tx this w/e 136.172kHz (score: 1): Author: <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 16:38:25 +0100; looks strong enough for a QSO --go for IT !!! --Original Message-- From: N1BUG Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2018 3:03 PM To: Discussion of the Lowfer (US, European, & UK) and MedFer bands ; rsgb_lf_grou; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-03/msg00274.html (11,985 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Re: [Lowfer] Tx this w/e 136.172kHz (score: 1): Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 18:13:48 +0100; Congrats to Mike and all involved. Do the good old times come back?! 73, Stefan Am 24.03.2018 16:03, schrieb N1BUG: I had almost a full call sign capture in the 2300 hour. http://www.n1bug.com/g3xdv-; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-03/msg00281.html (12,313 bytes)
4. Re: LF: Re: [Lowfer] Tx this w/e 136.172kHz (score: 1): Author: "Michael Sapp" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 14:05:33 -0400; Thank you Stefan: I have been toying with Bridge-T diplexers to better match my LPF or BPF filters to the preamps on two different LF/MF converters, and I believe I see a worthwhile improvement in ma; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-03/msg00285.html (13,814 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]