Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\.Ground\s+Loss\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\.Ground\s+Loss\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re.Ground Loss (score: 1): Author: "LAWRENCE MAYHEAD" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 19:17:20 +0100; I have just measured my TX ant impedance(R term) and it is 120 ohm! much higher than I originally thought.It is of course all ground loss,I am using 3 ground rods close to the TX and the house water/; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00259.html (8,360 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Re.Ground Loss (score: 1): Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 20:51:49 -0800; LAWRENCE MAYHEAD wrote: I have just measured my TX ant impedance(R term) and it is 120 ohm! much higher than I originally thought.It is of course all ground loss,I am using 3 ground rods close to the; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00260.html (9,577 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Re.Ground Loss (score: 1): Author: "Steve Rawlings" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 21:33:23 +0000; I have just measured my TX ant impedance(R term) and it is 120 ohm! much higher than I originally thought. It is of course all ground loss . . . . With the simple verticals which I use on 136 kHz, I; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00262.html (10,538 bytes)
4. Re: LF: Re.Ground Loss (score: 1): Author: "Hans-Joachim Brandt" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2000 20:19:33 +0100; Dear Lawrence, remembering the few results on ground resistance measurements published on this server I would regard your 120 ohms somewhat above average for 136 kHz. My own value is in the order of; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00277.html (10,572 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]