Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+earth\s+antenna\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+earth\s+antenna\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: RE: earth antenna (score: 1): Author: Mike-WE0H <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:06:18 -0500; In the USA we call that a SWAG (Scientific Wild Ass Guess) Mike-WE0H Rik S wrote: Stefan, based on the theory that an earth antenna is a loop and assuming that the "height" of the loop remains unchan; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-07/msg00025.html (10,215 bytes)
2. LF: Re: earth antenna (score: 1): Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:58:43 +0100; Stefan Keep climbing until you get enough height for an airborne Antenna., try a 300metre tree in the black forest, I might hear you then g3kev -- Original Message -- From: [email protected]; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-07/msg00326.html (12,460 bytes)
3. LF: RE: earth antenna (score: 1): Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 20:09:04 +0200; Any bets about the signal increase when increasing the spacing from 280m to 600m? Stefan, based on the theory that an earth antenna is a loop and assuming that the "height" of the loop remains unchan; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-07/msg00338.html (11,129 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]