Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+WSPR\s+\&\s+WSJT7\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+WSPR\s+\&\s+WSJT7\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: RE: WSPR & WSJT7 (score: 1): Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 12:18:18 +0100; Gary, Marco, I was afraid so. As Marco I prefer using WSJT7 because it is more user friendly (real time spectogram and input level measurement). I ended up with running WSJT7 and WSPR1.01 "in paralle; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00937.html (11,843 bytes)
2. LF: RE: WSPR & WSJT7 (score: 1): Author: "Gary - G4WGT" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 11:43:01 +0100; Rik, LF, Apparently not. I have not used it but have seen several posts commenting on the fact that it does not upload spots. I think the reason is that it is a QSO mode WSPR & the version 1.01 is be; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg01023.html (10,998 bytes)
3. LF: RE: WSPR & WSJT7 (score: 1): Author: "Scholz, Marco " <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 11:36:50 +0100; Hello Rik, I compared also both programs and i like a bit more WSJT7, because it has a real time spectrograph and measure in real time the audio input level. As a disvantage unfortunately it has no u; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg01104.html (8,629 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]